Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X

ABS: To be mandatory for bikes in the USA?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    ABS = stunting nightmare...not that I would bother stunting a Kat
    Some people are primarily positive, others negative. Some argue about whether the glass is half full or half empty. Me? I drink the contents and call it empty.

    Comment


    • #17
      not really fan of ABS, I fell it should be up to me if I wanna lock my tires or not. but whatcha gonna do! I've never actually locked the tires on my bike. in my pickup, only kicked on my ABS once in the snow ... just to see what it would do.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by steves View Post
        I'm paying a little over $150/yr for full coverage on the Sprint.
        I like the sounds of that. That's what I'm paying for my 2000 Kat 600 for full coverage.

        Comment


        • #19
          Like the idea myself
          99 Ford F150 4x4
          04 Mustang GT
          2010 Camaro SS
          06 GSX600F
          sigpic

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by 40something View Post
            My only complaint with ABS being a required feature is that the price of bikes is going to increase. There are several models with ABS available today and if you look at the price for those with vs. those without (same model) the ABS equipped are usually $800 to $1,500 more expensive.
            That and to me, it seems like they'll be more squids who won't bother to learn how to brake properly.

            Comment

            Working...
            X