Well, i eventually got the motor into my 82 today, went in pretty straight forward really.The new motor is a 92 GSXR750,which will have much more performance than the old GS1000 motor.Not as much as the 1127 that this was supposed to be, but that's another story While i was on a roll, i decided to change the rear end,but not sure i like it, it's only mocked up right now, so an easy change. The new undertail exhaust addition is what is causing my indecision, i want it to stay, but i think maybe the tail is now to high and forward, let me know what you think.
Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
Funny...those are the same engine mounts bolted to my frame except mines still missing the engine Wish all my time was geting eaten up by work and wedding planning...
Engine looks spot on but the tail...not too sure. Everytime I look at your bike the tail just seems to proportionately large for the rest of the bodywork. I like the second picture with no tail best.
Ever considered going back to stock? I saw an 80's GSX in streetfighters a while back that had a seat very much like a katana except he did an underseat exhaust with the exhaust exiting through tow holes on either side of the rear tailpiece. Just a thought.
Glad to see the oil cooler in the frame though...gets me motivated to put in a few more early mornings to get mine bolted in...
-
I agree about the tail looking too big. Also, what do you think about closing the gap between side covers and tail, so the line flow together? I think you should consider that."Stevie B" Boudreaux
I ride: '01 Triumph Sprint ST
Projects: Honda CB650 Bobber projects I, II and III
Take care of: 81 Honda CM400,72 Suzuki GT550
Watch over/advise on: 84 Honda Nighthawk 700S (now my son's bike)
For sale, or soon to be: 89 Katana 1100, 84 Honda V45 Magna, 95 Yamaha SECA II, 99 GSXR600, 95 ZX-6, 84 Kaw. KZ700, 01 Bandit 1200, 74 CB360.
Comment
-
Walt, the mounts are from plans on old skool suzuki, i am sure you told me about them.I made them from 304 stainless. Yeah the tail is an issue, i have always thought of it being to big too, but remmember, it's from a honda.I would like to make it work, but just cant get it right. StevieB,as fpr closing the gaps, i had thought of glassing the three peices together,but just a thought. Going back to stock? That has crossed my mind many times, i have the tail peice, but no seat. To make room for the undertail exhaust, i will still have to raise the rear seat area, mmm.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Honestly? I never liked this tail like it was mounted in your sig, looked as if it would fall off, did'nt do good too a further well-modded bike
my 2 cents...
Get rid off that tail and look for a tail which will flow with the rest off the lines, go back to stock, or......
You can get this one to work, it's got potential, but it would need pretty much shaving and welding, an even more inclined (clockwise-rotated) angle, shaving and welding the lowerparts in a way they meet the front aso.
Bottomline it's got to "loose weight" and it must flow better with the lines off the front.
Comment
-
Comment
-
I followed the lines off the tank Matthew, because I like the clean looks if lines are paralel too each other, but I must say the angle is quit identical.
Btw if I look at your Kat in your sig its tail is allso following the line off the tank. , so I guess you do agree bro 8)
Apart from that the steaper angle would enhance the looks off the SS-arm imo.
Like I said just a rough fast visual off what I would do, nothing more nothing less
Comment
-
So, i guess the tail has to go huh. I had no idea it was so unpopular, you should have told me before now, bitches. I really appriciate the input though, i have a couple of hours free this afternoon ,i will see what i can come up with, the stock tailpeice may work, will just have to make a custom seat or half seat.mmm.
Kwebbel, i have had the seat up at that angle before, and roughly in that position, just wasnt right. I think i will have to face the facts, it's got to go, no problem.
Comment
-
Comment
Comment